An introduction to reading response on frankenstein by mary shelley

This aspect probably hits readers that are parents the most. They understood her past as a mother who lost many of her children and who lived in fear of her next pregnancy resulting in deformities, death for her or the child, and the ultimate worry that she would not come to love her child.

Two questioned subjects, both Maggie and Anthony, were classified as Anthropologists. Background and random stuff, 1 page of action, 30 pages of him being in "utter agony with the bitterest remorse" and being a pansy and getting sick, 1 page of action, 10 pages of conclusion" Sarah.

One review summarized it simply as this: I found the book to be overall great and meaningful but also boring to read at times with little action. All aspects of literature have much to offer, but really have no significance without a reader. People expected an acclaimed literary success that has survived for years to deliver more than it does.

In each of their responses, they related the text most prominently to some aspect of society and its common normalities. I thought about this idea because go into full detail on how Frankenstein physically created his monster in the lab.

Barnes and Noble, Goodreads, and Amazon. This is why Reader Response is so important; it brings the importance of a novel back on the reader and their opinion on the work.

So I can see where the negative reviewers are coming from in their opinions when I think back to my first time reading this novel. This is where I would fit in. It was my second time reading the novel and I found that I had much better understanding of it this time around.

Victor dedicates years of his life to his work just to run from it once he finally succeeds. A complete degree difference from many of the very negative reviewers who stated they would never read the book again and many who even said they would rather inflict pain on themselves instead of reading Frankenstein, these positive reviewers cannot get enough of the story.

Hyde as his dark alter-ego. As hideous and dreadful it was insane enough to do it once, so why not one last time? If Shelley had decided to go that route of a psychological projection and added a Fight Club-esque twist, then Frankenstein would have been an even more wildly clever story.

This leads to another alternate scenario in the book that would have made more sense. Throughout the novel, the protagonist Victor Frankenstein meets misfortune after misfortune, all beginning with the mistake of reanimating life. I, who irretrievably destroyed thee by destroying all that thou lovedst.

Above I have mostly described the two extremes in opinion about the story but of course there is an intermediate stand-point that has opinions from both points of view.

It is ultimately his poor parenting that results in the misfortunes of his life and the lives of those close to him. Through a series of questions followed by the evaluations of the responses of four readers, it is clear that Frankenstein appeals to and challenges all three reader classifications.

Some of them are a little extreme though in their bashing on the novel. It states that the novel was begun during a summer vacation in the Swiss Alps, when unseasonably rainy weather and nights spent reading German ghost stories inspired the author and her literary companions to engage in a ghost story writing contest, of which this work is the only completed product.

The relationship between Frankenstein the monster throughout the book is as complicated as a lot of father-and-son relationships. The book barely touches on that process which would have been complicated and time consuming.

To think that Mary Shelley was exactly my age when she wrote Frankenstein is mind boggling because of her writing shows an author with a massive intellect and years of experience. The readers falling under the category of Character-Action-Moral tend to relate what they read to their own life which further judges the direction they take when drawing conclusions.

This is where the complaints about Victor being a terrible complaint come in. New perspectives were gained by a number of readers on many things in life after reading this book and many have read the book more than once and continue to read it from time to time.

I came across comments that talked about what Victor should have done - showed the creature some love, maybe given it a name, taught it something - and he would not have been in the terrible situation his life turned into.

Frankenstein is a fascinating story carried by the tragic arc of the titular character Victor Von Frankenstein, a man who began as an ambitious young student of science and philosophy with dreams of expanding the realm of possibilities for science to achieve and succeed by creating a physical form of life with an increasing intellectualism.

The majority of reviews I read - aka the positive opinions - were from people that obviously read into the deeper meaning of the story.Frankenstein by Mary Shelley Essay - Frankenstein by Mary Shelley The novel Frankenstein is written by Mary Shelley in it is still popular today as it is full of ideas and warnings, which are relevant to the modern audience.

Mary Shelley does this by warning the audience about the dangers of science. The preface to Frankenstein sets up the novel as entertainment, but with a serious twist—a science fiction that nonetheless captures “the truth of the elementary principles of human nature.” The works of Homer, Shakespeare, and Milton are held up as shining examples of.

Transcript of Introduction to Frankenstein. Introduction Who is Frankenstein?

Mysterious, Emotional, & Supernatural We hear the story much like Mrs. Margaret Saville would: piece by piece as Walton relays it. Because it is a frame story, we can anticipate three things: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein You - reading the novel.

Frankenstein Response Paper

Reading Between the Lines: An analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or, the Modern Prometheus, using Horace Walpole’s The Castle of Otranto as an example of male discourse about women it an introduction written by Mary Shelley herself, acknowledging her authorship.

Dec 11,  · Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has been found to be a book very prone to analysis, but the real importance lies in how the actual readers interpret the text.

Throughout the novel, the protagonist Victor Frankenstein meets misfortune after misfortune, all beginning with the mistake of reanimating life. Frankenstein Response Paper Leave a reply In the text of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstien, she explores theories presented within the book’s metaphors based off the tumultuous relationship between Frankenstein and the monster he created akin to fathers and sons, mortal enemies, and .

An introduction to reading response on frankenstein by mary shelley
Rated 5/5 based on 27 review