Not everything is equal, not everything is fair. It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.
Would the quality of the broadcasts or the coverage or the staging of the events be somehow diminished? Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants.
Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done. Instead, they go to the coaches, athletic directors, and some administrators, reports Edelman. On a typical day, a player will wake up before classes, get a lift or conditioning session in, go to class until 3 or 4 p.
The NCAA is also considered a non-profit company. Some players, if they come from a low-income household, get a few hundred dollars each semester from Pell Grants which enables them to buy chicken soup instead of chicken-flavored ramen.
Universities bring in hundreds of thousands or College athletes paid to play millions of dollars to their athletic programs each year. Will a salary for college-athletes ever come to be? You know what athletes receive as a bonus? The money to pay athletes must come from somewhere, which might put the least-popular college programs at risk of being cut.
The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer. So why would we pay athletes if entire teams are struggling to survive? Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship.
Through donations, ticket sales, media rights, advertising, and anything else with a price tag, these athletes are symbols for their school and their program. If a music student goes out in the summer and earns 50 grand, who objects?
The student-musician is no less a college student because he struck a lucrative deal. Leave a comment and debate your position! They are still in college—which is a privilege in itself—while pursuing their dreams of playing a sport. Nothing about the way hundreds of millions of dollars is distributed is equitable or even fair.
We were on the road all the time, even gone for two straight weeks at one point. That, in turn, can deprive other students of their chance to gain the education and experience at the college of their dreams, since their desired program will no longer be offered, says Anderson.
If a school makes a huge scientific achievement, they will be in the newspaper for a few days. Whether student-athletes should be paid is an ongoing debate often brought up during championship seasons, especially the college football playoffs and the basketball post-season.
The NCAA "prevents student-athletes from allowing their likeness to be used for promotional purposes. In question right now is whether the BCS even conducts its business dealings in a manner consistent with principles expressed in federal anti-trust laws.
Contrary to what all the opponents believe, being an athlete is a full-time job. Their revelations, short of Heisman Trophy winners having to return their statues, wind up penalizing only the kids and coaches who remain on the team and in the vast majority of cases have done nothing to merit a penalty themselves.
If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. First, their own coaches. Where exactly would the money come from? If a car dealer wants to strike that deal then good for the player in question. Furthermore, those who debate against paying student-athletes say it would change the very nature of college athletics.
The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. The flip side of this is that not all sports teams are profitable.
Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.
He would come back exhausted, but he needed whatever money they would pay him. Yet, no player can benefit from that work. We would pay athletes because when President Theodore Roosevelt helped create the NCAA inhe had no idea what it would grow into.Watch video · Former college stars on professional indoor football squads make about $ per game—with a $25 bonus if the team wins.
Outside the NBA, players in the professional developmental league—one step from making a NBA squad—make about $43, per year. The college scholarship model may not be so bad for student. The question, “Should college athletes be paid?” is re-hashed regularly.
There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university. Another 2% of these athletes reach the Division I level, reports Dave Anderson in his article “Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” If payments were involved, athletes would be incentivized to commit to the college.
I'm not saying we should be paying athletes $5, or even $10, per semester. If each athlete got $2, paid over the course of the semester, this would give them some spending cash and an opportunity to start managing their money.
The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their efforts.
Jan 09, · For college athletes, such an organization already exists: It is called the National College Players Association, headed by Ramogi Huma, the longtime activist who was the driving force behind the effort to unionize Northwestern’s football players.Download