The morality of the central family is brought into question throughout the play. He paints the image of a bright future in the absence of the abusing of social class with the reformation of Sheila throughout the play.
To what extent can Edwardian England be viewed as a moral society? Linking in with this, Birling has a completely contrasting identity in this play in comparison with the Inspector and seems to lack social awareness, which is conveyed through the use of dramatic irony.
Often it is a given that a Christian society based upon the universal values of generosity, kindness, justice, peace, will therefore also be a moral one.
A Marxist interpretation could be that Gerald has more modern views and is well aware of the advantages of joining his family and company! Priestley sets the scene within the Birling household of a rich family who are very self- satisfied and somewhat ignorant sitting at the table discussing future prospects with the family.
They are partly to blame for the lost generation of young soldiers during the war, frequently sent to their deaths by the incompetence and ruthlessness of upper class officers whose very ranks were given not based on merit but on outdated notions of upper class superiority due to the circumstances of their births.
Gerald is deceptively charming and his engagement to Sheila initially positions the audience on his side, almost as though he is a romantic hero of some kind. How can the Birlings be considered moral when they commit cardinal sins?
In conclusion, Priestley conveys ideas about responsibility positively in the form of Sheila and the Inspector but also negatively in the form of Mr Birling, who refuses to accept any responsibility for what he has done.
Priestley does this through his effective use of language and also stage directions in the play to convey a clear image to the audience on how the character is feeling and reacting to the various testing situations in the play.
Upper class young man Cardinal Sin: This conveys to the audience that the inspector knows what his responsibility is at that point in time and whatever is a distraction is not important to him whatsoever.
Birling may be a mouthpiece of some ignorant people who are at the top of society who refuse to take responsibility for the possible harm they may be causing to those lower down in the social class system such as Eva.
This shows a lack of responsibility because it is evident that Birling does not know the extremes of life in terms of poverty and suffering and as a result he believes that nothing bad can come of the Titanic sailing just because it is built with a lot of money.
He also offers supernatural themes to this otherwise normal play. Priestley could be implying here that the younger audience viewing the play were supposed to act in the same way as Sheila and really take in to account social responsibility to create a better future.
However, in Inspector calls essay family relationships, Priestley presents an Edwardian England that does not allow morality to interfere with the avaricious pursuit of wealth, status and privilege and encourages the audience to question the purported moral superiority of its wealthy citizens like the Birlings.
This shows that Priestley believed the Inspector to be the most responsible and morally enlightened character and as a result used him as a mouthpiece of his own views, because he realised that it was through the multi contribution of social abuse and the idea of social hierarchy was what lead to Eva committing suicide.Relationships between:ERIC & HIS PARENTSSHEILA & GERALDSHEILA & HER PARENTSGERALD & MR.
BIRLING. Home An Inspector Calls Q & A How does Priestley show the real An Inspector Calls He hs great respect for Gerald and his family, maybe that is because they are in upper class and the Birlings are in middle class or he is generally the.
Key theme: Family relationships As the curtain opens on Act Three, the Birling family and the Inspector are all present ‘staring at’ Eric (p. 50). Priestley puts Eric in the spotlight, the last of the Birlings to be held accountable for Eva Smith’s death.
Published: Mon, 5 Dec Inspector Goole is the eponymous character in An Inspector Calls by J.B Priestley who has many functions. Primarily, he is introduced to the play to interrogate the Birling Family and Gerald Croft, but Priestley also uses him to move the plot forward and as a device for the writer to voice his opinion, furthermore he controls movement on stage, encourage the.
May 15, · This is the third in a mini series of posts on morality and relationships in An Inspector Calls all aimed at higher ability students for the English Literature GCSE.
The morality of the central family is brought into question throughout the play. They each represent different strata of upper class society but symbolically each. The Inspector recognises that his revelations have disrupted family relationships: ‘There’ll be plenty of time, when I’ve gone, for you all to adjust your family relationships.
Mr Birling questions Sheila’s ‘loyalty’ to the family when she has chosen to be honest about Eric’s drinking.
Jun 12, · Inspector calls essay watch. Priestley cleverly uses the contrasting personalities of all of the characters in the Birling family along with the socialist Inspector who is a mouthpiece for Priestley’s view in the morality play.
The inspector is seemingly the most responsible in his ideas, as we can see by the connotations of his speech as.Download